Atlantic Yards or Atlantic Lots?

Watch the new slideshow about the interim parking planned for Atlantic Yards. Click here to visit AtlanticLots.com

Video of Rally Against Demolition for Parking


Governance Video


Watch a slideshow

Click here to watch a pop-up slideshow of images, maps and siteplans of the proposed Atlantic Yards project.

Atlantic Yards would:

Contain the same amount of development as 23 Williamsburgh Savings Banks

Generate over 20,000 new vehicle trips every day with no plan to avoid gridlock

Contain affordable housing that won't be affordable to average Brooklynites

Potentially be built without significant input from New Yorkers

» more project facts

5742
New Yorkers support BrooklynSpeaks
Join them!

Log In

Visited the site before? Login here. Visiting the site for the first time? Sign up here.

Affordable Housing

The current Atlantic Yards proposal is to be commended for including 2,250 units of 'affordable' housing. The creation of a significant number of affordable units is drastically needed and would be a considerable benefit to New York.

However, two thirds of the units in the development will be sold or rented at market rate, and 60% of the affordable units would only be affordable to families making in excess of the Brooklyn median income, which is $35,000 annually. Also, despite the fact that the proposed project will displace families earning less than $21,000 annually, none of the affordable units currently proposed are affordable to those families. Click here to see the income band chart released by Forest City Ratner.

This means that the project would actually accelerate the gentrification and displacement that is already in progress. It is also unclear how much of the affordable housing would be built in the first phase of the project, and it is possible that the majority of the affordable units would only come online after 2010.

The sponsors of BrooklynSpeaks therefore propose that:

  • A significantly greater proportion of the affordable units be affordable to those earning $35,000 annually, with particular emphasis on creating units for large families earning less than $21,000
  • The proportion of affordable units built in the first phase of the project should be the same as the overall proportion of affordable units in the whole project

In addition, we propose that the following also be explored:

  • Raising the proportion of affordable units in the overall development, including both rental and condo
  • Creating affordable homeownership opportunites on-site, rather than as part of a separate development as currently proposed